Skip to main content
What are Scope 2 Emissions?
  1. Glossary/

What are Scope 2 Emissions?

6 mins·
Ben Schmidt
Author
I am going to help you build the impossible.

Every startup founder eventually hits a point where the technicalities of sustainability move from a vague concept to a line item on a spreadsheet. As you build your company, you will likely encounter the Greenhouse Gas Protocol. This protocol is the global standard for measuring and managing emissions. It divides emissions into three categories. Scope 2 emissions represent one of the most significant entry points for a business to understand its environmental impact.

At its core, Scope 2 emissions are indirect greenhouse gas emissions associated with the purchase of electricity, steam, heat, or cooling. These are not gases you emit directly from your own equipment. Instead, they are the emissions produced by the utility provider you pay to power your office, your data center, or your manufacturing facility.

For a digital startup, these emissions often represent the bulk of your operational footprint before you account for your supply chain. If you rent an office or operate a server, you are responsible for the emissions that the power plant created to generate that energy.

Understanding this term is the first step in moving beyond simple marketing claims toward real operational accountability. It allows you to see the invisible trail of carbon that your daily operations leave behind.

The Mechanics of Indirect Energy Consumption

#

The distinction between direct and indirect is the most important part of this definition. If you own a fleet of delivery trucks that burn gasoline, those are direct emissions because the combustion happens in your equipment. Those are Scope 1.

Scope 2 is different because the physical act of burning fuel happens at a third-party site. You are not the one burning the coal or natural gas. The utility company is. However, because you are the one consuming the energy that resulted from that combustion, the accounting frameworks attribute those emissions to your organization.

Most startups focus on four specific types of energy under this category.

  • Electricity: The most common source for almost every modern business.
  • Steam: Used in certain industrial processes or for heating large buildings.
  • Heat: Often distributed through district heating systems.
  • Cooling: Chilled water or air provided through a centralized system.

For a remote-first startup, the boundaries can become blurry. You must decide if the electricity used in your employees’ home offices counts as part of your organizational footprint. While many small companies ignore this in the early stages, larger organizations and those seeking specific certifications often have to develop a policy for measuring this data.

Location Based Versus Market Based Reporting

#

When you begin to report your Scope 2 emissions, you will find that there are two primary ways to calculate the numbers. This is a point of confusion for many founders, but the distinction matters for your long-term strategy.

The location-based method calculates emissions based on the average intensity of the local power grid where the energy is consumed. If your office is in a region that relies heavily on coal, your location-based emissions will be higher than if your office were in a region with high wind or solar penetration. This method reflects the physical reality of the grid you are plugged into.

The market-based method allows you to factor in the specific choices you make about where you buy your energy. If you sign a contract for 100 percent renewable energy or purchase Renewable Energy Certificates, your market-based emissions could be zero. This is even true if the physical electrons hitting your laptop still come from a coal-heavy local grid.

This creates a strategic question for a founder. Do you focus on the physical reality of your location, or do you focus on the contractual reality of your energy procurement? Most reporting frameworks now require businesses to report both. This dual-reporting approach prevents companies from hiding a high-carbon reality behind a few cheap energy certificates.

Comparing Scope 2 to Scope 1 and Scope 3

#

It is helpful to view Scope 2 as the middle ground of carbon accounting. It is often easier to measure than Scope 1 or Scope 3.

Scope 1 emissions are direct. They involve things like company-owned cars or on-site furnaces. For many software startups, Scope 1 is actually zero because they do not own physical assets that burn fuel.

Scope 3 emissions are the most complex. They include everything else in your value chain. This covers the emissions of your suppliers, the travel your employees take on commercial flights, and even the emissions produced by your customers when they use your product. Scope 3 is usually the largest category but the hardest to track accurately.

Scope 2 sits in a manageable sweet spot. You have the data because you have the utility bills. You have a level of control because you can choose which buildings to rent or which energy providers to support. By mastering Scope 2 first, a founder builds the internal muscles needed to eventually tackle the much larger challenge of Scope 3.

Practical Scenarios for Startups

#

How does this play out in the life of a growing business? Consider a startup selecting a new headquarters. If you choose a building with high energy efficiency and a landlord who purchases green power, your Scope 2 footprint remains low. This can make your company more attractive to large enterprise customers who are auditing their own Scope 3 emissions.

Another scenario involves cloud computing. While the electricity used by servers is technically a Scope 3 emission for you because it belongs to the provider, many founders treat it with the same rigor as Scope 2. If you choose a cloud provider that is carbon neutral, you are effectively reducing the energy-related impact of your product.

Investors are increasingly looking at these metrics during due diligence. They want to see that a founder understands the regulatory landscape. If carbon taxes are implemented in the future, a company with high Scope 2 emissions faces a direct financial risk. Showing that you have a plan to manage these costs demonstrates operational maturity.

Navigating the Unknowns of Carbon Accounting

#

Despite the clear definitions, there are many things we still do not know or cannot perfectly measure. One of the biggest challenges is data transparency from landlords. If you rent a small coworking space, you might not get a specific energy bill. You are often left guessing your share of the building’s total consumption.

There is also the question of additionality. Does buying a green energy certificate actually result in new renewable energy being added to the grid? Or are you just paying for the right to claim energy that would have been produced anyway? Scientists and economists are still debating the best ways to verify these claims.

As a founder, you should ask your providers hard questions. Ask your landlord for energy data. Ask your utility company for their specific emission factors. Ask your cloud provider for a breakdown of the energy used by your specific instances.

You do not need to have all the answers today. The goal is to start asking the questions. By treating Scope 2 emissions as a standard business metric like churn or burn rate, you ensure that you are building a company that is resilient and ready for a world that increasingly values transparency and sustainability. Tracking this data is work, but it is the kind of work that builds a solid and remarkable foundation for the future.